William Cox, Synopsys, Inc.
Patrick Emsweller, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Beverly Miller Alvarez, Lenovo Group Ltd.
Scott Moore, IBM
Kathleen Trimble, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Takayuki Uchiyama, Panasonic Corporation
David Waltermire, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Members of MITRE CVE Team in Attendance
2:00 – 2:15: Introductions, action items from the last meeting
2:15 – 2:30: Working Groups
2:30 – 2:45: Root CNA Update
2:45 – 3:55: Open Discussion
3:55 – 4:00: Action items, wrap-up
§ Strategic Planning (SPWG) – Kent Landfield/Chris Coffin
a. Outreach OCWG for most of this section (noted otherwise).
i. Localization – should start in the QWG for guidance, then to the AWG for implementation.
ii. Upstream producers –
1. CNA Recruitment
iii. Downstream users –
iv. Related Projects
1. Vulnerability Description
3. Product identification and management
b. Metrics – CVE Board
i. Community metrics (Public metrics)
ii. CNA specific metrics
iii. Program performance (Report card)
c. Knowledge capture/transfer - CVE Board
i. Record Working Group meetings
1. Where to store the recordings?
ii. Issue tracking
iii. Storage of WG materials – SharePoint site (CVE CNA site)
a. Program Structure SPWG
b. Roles, responsibilities, and requirements SPWG
i. Disclosure Policies
1. Non-vendor CNAs
a. Add new non-vendor CNAs is on hold until the Board can come to an agreement on the requirements for this type of CNA
2. Root CNA shopping
3. Assigning CVE IDs to vulnerabilities in a non-CNA vendor’s product
c. Coverage – CVE Board
i. What’s in, What’s out
ii. End of life
iii. Software as a service
v. Open source software
i. Operationalizing Root CNAs - SPWG
ii. For new CNAs - CNACWG
iii. How to supply refreshers CVE Board/CNACWG
i. CNA Process – Front Door or Back Door: How should CNAs communicate with each other, and how would that information be managed?
iii. Scope statement best practices
iv. Rules Violations
i. Prevent duplicates
ii. Information requirements
4. Split problem type in to vuln. type, root cause, or impact
5. Don’t require references
iii. Should the description match the separate metadata fields
4. CVE List - QWG
a. Formats (all different formats) – CVE Board
i. How can the download formats be updated or retired?
b. CVE Tagging
i. Helps filtering
ii. How to identify the categories we need
iii. Should the tagging be attached to the product or the vulnerability?
iv. Could we leverage a product listing the CVE User Registry?
v. Can it be automated?
vi. EOL tagging
CVE_Board_Meeting_24 July 2019_FINAL.pdf (463K) Download Attachment
|Free forum by Nabble||Edit this page|