[EXT] Re: Discussion items assigned by CVE Board for QWG
I am not sure what the reason this list was mass published to each and every CVE Working Group….This list is not accurate and horribly unorganized totally lacking context
as to what is to be discussed. It was not developed for work assignments. I must have missed the meeting where “The CVE Board has identified discussion items/issues that should be assigned to the working groups for further discussion.”
The list was meant as a pool of conversations the Board needed to have.
The purpose of the Future Discussions list is/was to act as a “Parking Lot” for Board conversations. We do too much status on Board calls and not enough discussions on items
important to the program, but that is another topic… There are many areas briefly discussed on Board calls where we did not have the time to do a topic justice. In that case the topic was added to the Future Discussions list (Parking Lot).
Somewhere along the way, MITRE decided to put it into a bulleted form and drop the context. Then, not sure why, it was reorganized to its current state. This
was not what was discussed initially. We were just going to put it into Ongoing, Future and OBE categories. That never happened at all.
What is the purpose of duplicating this post across the whole program? Has the purpose of the list changed and if so, to what? How does the Board keep its future
conversations internal until it is time for us to have them?
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Attached is a list of discussion topics that originated from multiple previous CVE Board meeting calls. The CVE Board has identified discussion items/issues that should be assigned to the working groups for further discussion. So you have full context, I am
providing the entire list for your reference.